Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 92 Idaho 579 - State v. Handran

State v. Handran’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
3
states following
April 1984
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1257

Relies on Mullican v. United States · Kelley v. Meyers · Bayless v. United States · People v. Ganger · Hamner v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A]n alleged error or irregularity. . . in judicial proceedings leading to conviction and confinement does not so invalidate the judgment and the confinement as to justify escape. The prisoner's remedy is to seek judicial relief from the claimed illegal incarceration.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.