92 Ill. App. 2d 341 - People v. Ramirez’s Empirical Analysis
1968
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
December 1976
most recently cited
1 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“600 [I]n passing upon the entirety of circumstances surrounding the rendition of [a] confession, our court will lend considerable credence to the findings of the trial judge who saw and heard the witnesses as to matters of credibility. It is a determination which will not ordinarily be disturbed on review, absent some abuse of judicial discretion or unless shown by the attacking party to be contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence. People v. Hudson, 38 Ill. 2d 616 , 233 N.E.2d 403 (1968); People v. Hall, 38 Ill. 2d 308 , 231 N.E.2d 416 (1967); People v. Spencer, 27 Ill. 2d 320 , 189 N.E.2d 270 (1963).””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.