92 Kan. 254
Decided April 11, 1914
Supreme Court of Kansas · decided 1914-04-11
<p>OPINION ON REHEARING.</p> <p>Appeal from Shawnee district court, division No. 1; Alston W. Dana, judge.</p>
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently August 1914
1 state decisions
Relies on Holmes v. Holt
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Reaffirmed · Decided 1914-04-11
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1This case was very fully presented and ably argued by counsel for both parties, and was decided upon the questions which were considered determinative of all the issues involved therein.
¶2On rehearing certain questions have been again fully presented and have been again considered. The court is satisfied with the original opinion (Holmes v. Holt, 90 Kan. 774, 136 Pac. 246), and it is adhered to.