Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 92 Mass. App. Ct. 567 - Reichenbach v. Haydock

92 Mass. App. Ct. 567 - Reichenbach v. Haydock’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 2021
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Batchelder v. Allied Stores Corp. · Duracraft Corp. v. Holmes Products Corp. · Bell v. Mazza · United States v. Eastern Shawnee Tribe · Fabre v. Walton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) [its] complained of conduct is petitioning activity; (2) the petitioning activity is [its] own petitioning activity; and (3) [290 Auto Body's] claims are solely based on the petitioning activity.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “An interlocutory appeal from the denial of an anti-SLAPP special motion is available under the doctrine of present execution.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.