Wright v. Ryland’s Empirical Analysis
1901
Citation profile
1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently February 1924
1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Polk v. Pendleton · Walsh v. Boyle · Busey v. Reese · Lambson v. Moffett · McKnew v. Duvall
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““They are in as of the estate of the judgment debtor, and before the judgment can be revived, and enforced by execution against the land, so as to divest their title, it is necessary to warn them by the scire facias, so that they may have an opportunity of making their defense and of claiming contribution from others holding lands of the judgment debtor, bound by the judgment.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. McMullen v. Waters
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.