¶1The only question presented for consideration in this case is whether the evidence is sufficient to justify the verdict. No exceptions were taken on the trial in the court below, and no errors in law are urged or relied upon. Our examination of the evidence leads to the conclusion that it is not so clearly and palpably against the verdict as to justify a reversal, and the order appealed from is affirmed.
92 Minn. 10
Eliason v. Herman
Decided April 15, 1904
Supreme Court of Minnesota · decided 1904-04-15
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Chippewa •county, Qvale, J., denying a motion for a new trial, after a trial and verdict in favor of plaintiff for $29.
Affirmed · Decided 1904-04-15