Sims v. Morrison’s Empirical Analysis
1904
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
May 1913
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Schurz · Marquez v. Frisbie · Cornelius v. Kessel · Brown v. Hitchcock · Hospes v. Northwestern Manuf'g & Car Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The rule applies with greater force to the case at bar, for here the legal title to the land is in the general government, with no certainty that it will ever become vested in defendants, and the rights of both are purely equitable. The government has the paramount and sole authority to dispose of its lands, and until it parts with and conveys its title, the courts are powerless to aid litigants in controversies affecting or involving individual claims thereto.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage““It is only after the United States has parted with its title, and the individual has become vested with it, that the equities on which he holds it may be enforced, and not before. Such being the law, a complaint which seeks to have the court adjust equities between rival claimants to government land is fatally defective if it fails to show that the title has become vested in the individual against whom it is sought to enforce supposed equities.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.