Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 92 MOAPP 89 - Poor v. Watson

Poor v. Watson’s Empirical Analysis

1902

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
March 1936
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently March 1936

7 state decisions

501902191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brown v. Piper · Norwalk Gaslight Co. v. Borough of Norwalk · Jamieson v. Indiana Natural Gas & Oil Co. · Barker v. Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad · Hamman v. Central Coal & Coke Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Judicial notice should be taken of things which are of general knowledge among people of ordinary information. They will take judicial notice of recognized scientific facts and principles without the necessity of evidence and may do so of their own motion.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.