Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 92 NC 394 - Harper v. . Dail Bro.

Harper v. . Dail Bro.’s Empirical Analysis

1885

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
April 1986
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently April 1986

5 state decisions

2018851890190019101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When a receipt is evidence of a contract between parties it stands on the same footing with other contracts in writing, and cannot be contradicted or varied by parol evidence; but when it is an acknowledgment of the payment of money or of the delivery of goods, it is merely prima facie evidence of the fact which it recites, and may be contradicted by oral testimony. 1 Greenleaf on Evidence, sec. 308; Reid v. Reid , 2 Dev., 247 ; Wilson v. Derr , 69 N.C. 137 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “What claim he settled when the receipt was given by B., if anything was said about what claim he was paying?”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.