92 N.C. App.
Volume 92 — North Carolina Court of Appeals Reports
115 opinions
- 92 N.C. App. 1In re the Appeal from the Civil Penalty Assessed for Violations of the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act Administered by the Department of Natural Resources & Community Development by Harris (1988)
- 92 N.C. App. 21Iredell Digestive Disease Clinic v. Petrozza (1988)
- 92 N.C. App. 38Woodson v. Rowland (1988)
- 92 N.C. App. 50State v. Fletcher (1988)
- 92 N.C. App. 59Alston v. Monk (1988)
- 92 N.C. App. 68Northampton County Drainage District Number One v. Bailey (1988)
- 92 N.C. App. 75State v. King (1988)
- 92 N.C. App. 80State v. Fultz (1988)
- 92 N.C. App. 86Polk v. Biles (1988)
- 92 N.C. App. 90Telephone Services, Inc. v. General Telephone Co. of the South (1988)
- 92 N.C. App. 94State v. Barnhardt (1988)
- 92 N.C. App. 99Freeman v. Monroe (1988)
- 92 N.C. App. 102State v. Parker (1988)
- 92 N.C. App. 105Milam v. Milam (1988)
- 92 N.C. App. 109Freeman v. Johnson (1988)
- 92 N.C. App. 112State v. Suggs (1988)
- 92 N.C. App. 116McIver v. McIver (1988)
- 92 N.C. App. 129Ruffin Woody & Associates, Inc. v. Person County (1988)
- 92 N.C. App. 142Hinnant v. Holland (1988)
- 92 N.C. App. 152State v. Colvin (1988)
- 92 N.C. App. 161Iverson v. TM One, Inc. (1988)
- 92 N.C. App. 168State v. Allen (1988)
- 92 N.C. App. 175State v. Parsons (1988)
- 92 N.C. App. 181State v. Parks (1988)
- 92 N.C. App. 187Ramsey v. Keever's Used Cars (1988)
- 92 N.C. App. 193Meyers v. Department of Human Resources (1988)
- 92 N.C. App. 198Shaw v. LaNotte, Inc. (1988)
- 92 N.C. App. 203State v. Joseph (1988)
- 92 N.C. App. 207Clark v. Dickstein (1988)
- 92 N.C. App. 211Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Welch (1988)
- 92 N.C. App. 215Sutton v. Ward (1988)
- 92 N.C. App. 218Cockerham v. PILOT LIFE INS. CO., INC. (1988)
- 92 N.C. App. 222Richards v. Town of Valdese (1988)
1. Master and Servant 65.2 — workers' compensation — back injury — injury by accident or from specific traumatic incident A back injury claimant under the Workers' Compensation Act may proceed under the theory that he was injured by accident, that is, by an unlooked for and untoward event which was not expected or designed by the claimant, or he may prove that his injury arose from a specific traumatic incident. 2. Master and Servant 65.2 — workers' compensation — back injury — specific traumatic incident — definition — firefighter jumping on and off truck Through the 1983 amendment to N.C.G.S. <cross_reference>97-2</cross_reference>(6), the General Assembly did not intend to limit the definition of specific traumatic incident to an instantaneous occurrence; rather, events which occur contemporaneously, during a cognizable time period, and which cause a back injury, do fit the definition intended by the legislature. The Industrial Commission erred in concluding that claimant suffered no injury as a result of a specific traumatic incident where claimant presented evidence that he repeatedly jumped on and off fire trucks<page_number>Page 223</page_number> for a fifteen hour period, nine of those hours in full gear; he normally did not have to wear his gear for an extended period or jump on and off trucks; and though claimant could point to no specific instant in time when his back began to hurt, he could point to a series of contemporaneous events which could have caused his injury.
- 92 N.C. App. 226Wells v. Wells (1988)
- 92 N.C. App. 230State v. Chambers (1988)
- 92 N.C. App. 234T'ai Co. v. Market Square Ltd. Partnership (1988)
- 92 N.C. App. 237Fowler v. B. E. & K. Construction, Inc. (1988)
- 92 N.C. App. 240State v. Swain (1988)
- 92 N.C. App. 246State v. Cannon (1988)
- 92 N.C. App. 257Cline v. Teich for Cline (1988)
- 92 N.C. App. 265State v. Speckman (1988)
- 92 N.C. App. 274Adams v. Adams (1988)
- 92 N.C. App. 282State v. Hamad (1988)
- 92 N.C. App. 290Cieszko v. Clark (1988)
- 92 N.C. App. 299Locklear v. Locklear (1988)
- 92 N.C. App. 306Harwood v. Johnson (1988)
- 92 N.C. App. 313W & J Rives, Inc. v. Kemper Insurance Group (1988)
- 92 N.C. App. 320Wilson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance (1988)
- 92 N.C. App. 327Langley v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. (1988)
- 92 N.C. App. 331Kimmel v. Brett (1988)
- 92 N.C. App. 336Ferguson v. Williams (1988)
- 92 N.C. App. 341Ramey v. Sherwin-Williams Co. (1988)
- 92 N.C. App. 346Stallings v. North Carolina Department of Transportation (1988)
- 92 N.C. App. 351Miller v. Miller (1988)
- 92 N.C. App. 355Wilson v. State Residence Committee of the University of North Carolina (1988)
- 92 N.C. App. 359Morris v. Morris (1988)
- 92 N.C. App. 364State v. Ayers (1988)
- 92 N.C. App. 368McLaughlin v. Martin (1988)
- 92 N.C. App. 370McLeod v. Faust (1988)
Appeal and Error 37 — failure to file settled record on appeal Plaintiff's appeal is dismissed for failure to file a properly settled record on appeal where the record was not agreed to and was filed before expiration of the 45-day period allowed by the trial judge for defendant to serve objections or file a counter-proposed record on appeal. Appellate Rules 11, 12(a) and 25.
- 92 N.C. App. 372Automotive Restyling Concepts, Inc. v. Central Service Lincoln Mercury, Inc. (1988)
- 92 N.C. App. 375Hill v. City of Kinston (1988)
- 92 N.C. App. 378Carr v. Carr (1988)
- 92 N.C. App. 385State v. Attmore (1988)
- 92 N.C. App. 398State v. Marshall (1988)
- 92 N.C. App. 413Taylor v. Taylor (1988)
- 92 N.C. App. 422State v. Scarborough (1988)
- 92 N.C. App. 430State v. Charles (1988)
- 92 N.C. App. 438Brandt v. Brandt (1988)
- 92 N.C. App. 446Newton v. City of Winston-Salem (1988)
- 92 N.C. App. 453State v. Summers (1988)
- 92 N.C. App. 460Mitchell v. Rothwell (1988)
- 92 N.C. App. 467Garris v. Garris (1988)
- 92 N.C. App. 473Watson v. Winston-Salem Transit Authority (1988)
- 92 N.C. App. 478Joyner v. Rocky Mount Mills (1988)
- 92 N.C. App. 483Gaddy v. Anson Wood Products (1988)
- 92 N.C. App. 490Byrd v. George W. Kane, Inc. (1988)
- 92 N.C. App. 494State v. Willis (1988)
- 92 N.C. App. 500State v. Smith (1988)
- 92 N.C. App. 505Cardwell v. Smith (1988)
- 92 N.C. App. 509Beam v. Beam (1988)
- 92 N.C. App. 513Wesley v. Bland (1988)
- 92 N.C. App. 516Jansen v. Collins (1988)
- 92 N.C. App. 520Crist v. Moffatt (1988)
- 92 N.C. App. 523State v. Fink (1989)
- 92 N.C. App. 535Hedgecock Builders Supply Co. of Greensboro v. White (1989)
- 92 N.C. App. 545State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. Nantahala Power & Light Co. (1989)
- 92 N.C. App. 555State v. Clinding (1989)
- 92 N.C. App. 563State v. Greenspan (1989)
- 92 N.C. App. 571Bumgarner v. Tomblin (1989)
- 92 N.C. App. 577State v. Taylor (1989)
- 92 N.C. App. 581Dunlap v. Clarke Checks, Inc. (1989)
- 92 N.C. App. 586Cruise v. Cruise (1989)
- 92 N.C. App. 589Gray v. Venters (1989)
- 92 N.C. App. 592Nelson v. Food Lion, Inc. (1989)
- 92 N.C. App. 601Batch v. Town of Chapel Hill (1989)
- 92 N.C. App. 627State v. Davis (1989)
- 92 N.C. App. 639State v. Russell (1989)
- 92 N.C. App. 651State v. Agubata (1989)
- 92 N.C. App. 662Matter of Bishop (1989)
- 92 N.C. App. 671State v. Kinney (1989)
- 92 N.C. App. 680Lamb v. Lamb (1989)
- 92 N.C. App. 687Terry v. Pullman Trailmobile (1989)
- 92 N.C. App. 695State v. Vandiver (1989)
- 92 N.C. App. 702Cox v. Cox (1989)
- 92 N.C. App. 708McGladrey, Hendrickson & Pullen v. Syntek Finance Corp. (1989)
- 92 N.C. App. 713Tolaram Fibers, Inc. v. Tandy Corp. (1989)
- 92 N.C. App. 719Crumpler v. Thornburg (1989)
- 92 N.C. App. 724Rollinwood Homeowners Ass'n v. Jarman (1989)
- 92 N.C. App. 729State v. Booth (1989)
- 92 N.C. App. 733Fowler v. North Carolina Department of Crime Control & Public Safety (1989)
- 92 N.C. App. 737Lewis v. North Carolina Department of Human Resources (1989)
- 92 N.C. App. 741Rudisill v. Icenhour (1989)
- 92 N.C. App. 744Dellinger v. Michal (1989)
- 92 N.C. App. 748Davis v. Hiatt (1989)
- 92 N.C. App. 752State v. Williams (1989)