92 N.C. App. 175 - State v. Parsons’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
August 2001
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Ashe v. Swenson · United States v. Oppenheimer · King v. Grindstaff · State v. McKenzie · United States v. Cejas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the issues must be the same as those involved in the prior action, (2) the issues must have been raised and actually litigated in the prior action, (3) the issues must have been material and relevant to the disposition of the prior action, and (4) the determination of the issues in the prior action must have been necessary and essential to the resulting judgment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.