Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 92 N.C. App. 282 - State v. Hamad

92 N.C. App. 282 - State v. Hamad’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 1991
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Chambers v. Mississippi · State v. Moorman · State v. Chase · State v. Gray · State v. . Quick

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he sentencing judge may reduce the fine, or impose a prison term less than the applicable minimum prison term provided by this subsection, or suspend the prison term imposed and place a person on probation when such person has, to the best of his knowledge, provided substantial assistance in the identification, arrest or conviction of any accomplices, accessories, co-conspirators, or principals if the sentencing judge enters in the record a finding that the person to be sentenced has rendered such substantial assistance. (Emphasis added.)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.