92 N.C. App. 351 - Miller v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
35 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently December 2018 · most notably 117 N.C. App. 693 - In Re Nolen (1995), 159 N.C. App. 75 - In Re Clark (2003)
35 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Shankle v. Shankle · 53 N.C. App. 373 - Matter of Peirce · 68 N.C. App. 752 - Fortis Corp. v. Northeast Forest Products · 71 N.C. App. 215 - Williams and Michael, PA v. Kennamer · 14 N.C. App. 159 - McAlister v. McAlister
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]here a verbatim transcript of the proceedings is unavailable, there are `means ... available for [a party] to compile a narration of the evidence, i.e., reconstructing the testimony with the assistance of those persons present at the hearing.'”
5 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. In Re LOK · IN THE MATTER OF CR“It is the appellant's responsibility to make sure that the record on appeal is complete and in proper form.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“[s]o much of the litigation, set out in the form provided in Rule 9(c)(1), as is necessary for an understanding of all issues presented on appeal[.]”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.