Fish v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently June 2015
1 federal appellate · 14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Austin v. State · Goldsmith v. Sheriff of Lyon County · Shepp v. State · 27 Utah 2d 354 - State v. Sanders · Bingham v. People
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ ‘Hearsay’ means a statement offered in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted unless: “3. The statement is offered against a party and is: “(e) A statement by a coconspirator of a party during the course and in furtherance of the conspiracy.””
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Cranford v. State · Carr v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.