Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 92 N.M. 465 - Gengler v. Phelps

Gengler v. Phelps’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
8
states following
September 2012
most recently cited

4 district · 29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently September 2012 · most notably Fleming v. Moore (1981), Marchiondo v. Brown (1982)

4 district · 29 state decisions

17019781980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc. · Jacron Sales Co. v. Sindorf · 35 Ill. App. 3d 735 - Millsaps v. Bankers Life Co. · Neece v. Kantu · Stewart v. Ging

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Abuse [of privilege] arises out of the publisher’s lack of belief, or reasonable grounds for belief, in the truth of the alleged defamation; by the publication of the material for an improper use; by the publication to a person not reasonably necessary for the accomplishment of the purpose; or by publication not reasonably necessary to accomplish the purpose.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The privilege conferred by the consent of the person about whom the defamatory matter is published is absolute. The protection given by it is complete, and it is not affected by the ill will or personal hostility of the publisher or by any improper purpose for which he may make the publication.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.