¶1 reads for affirmance of judgment, and for reversal of order without prejudice to any further application to the Supreme Court in reference to the allowance, which plaintiff may be advised to make.
¶2 All concur.
¶3 Judgment and order accordingly.
92 N.Y. 651
Hun v. . Salter
Decided May 8, 1883
New York Court of Appeals · decided 1883-05-08
Thebe were two appeals in this action, one from a judgment of General Term affirming a judgment of Special Term, the other from an order of General Term affirming an order granting an extra allowance of costs to the plaintiff. The appeal from the judgment was decided on the opinion below. As to the appeal from the order the court say: “ Order giving extra allowance of costs to the plaintiff, and this we think should be sustained.
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1883-05-08
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 1907
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →