92 Ohio App. 3d 108 - State v. Cooper’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

3 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “We reluctantly agree with Cooper. In our view, Cooper's alleged conduct ought to be prohibited, but is not. At most, Cooper's conduct may have been preliminary to a solicitation to his victim to engage in sexual activity with him, which might constitute attempted importuning.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Hartman, 91040 (3-12-2009)

2. “Solicitation of a child under the age of thirteen requires no more than that a request be addressed to the child in a form reasonably calculated to cause the child to understand the nature of the request, and to afford the child an opportunity to respond.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Williams, Unpublished Decision (7-20-2006)

3. “sufficient to constitute a solicitation to the child to disrobe, at least partially,”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Curtis