Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 92 Ohio App. 3d 238 - State v. Boulabeiz

92 Ohio App. 3d 238 - State v. Boulabeiz’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
October 2005
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Lott · City of Cincinnati v. Epperson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The general rule in Ohio regarding special instructions in a criminal case is that if the requested instructions to the jury are correct, pertinent and timely presented, they must be included, at least in substance, in the general charge.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.