Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 92 OHIOST3D 191 - State v. Hill

State v. Hill’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

548
cited by 548 later decisions
3
states following
March 2026
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 545 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 548 later decisions — most recently March 2026 · most notably State v. Barnes (2002), State v. Rogers (2015)

3 federal appellate · 545 state decisions

2210200120102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Chapman v. State of California · United States v. Olano · Gideon v. Wainwright · Brecht v. Abrahamson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 548 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “with the utmost caution, under exceptional circumstances and only to prevent a manifest miscarriage of justice.”
    42 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Plain errors or defects affecting substantial rights may be noticed although they were not brought to the attention of the court.”
    31 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “As part of the inquiry into whether plain error occurred, a reviewing court 'must examine the error asserted by the [defendant] in light of all of the evidence properly admitted at trial and determine whether the jury would have convicted the defendant even if the error had not occurred.' State v. Slagle (1992), 65 Ohio St.3d 597 , 605, 605 N.E.2d 916 , 925. Reversal is warranted only if the outcome of the trial clearly would have been different absent the error.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.