Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 92 OHIOST3D 241 - State v. Palmer

State v. Palmer’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
November 2022
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently November 2022

15 state decisions

160200120102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · State v. Bradley · State v. Williams · State v. Murnahan · Jones v. West

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he two-pronged analysis found in Strickland v. Washington (1984), 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 , is the appropriate standard to assess whether [an applicant] has raised a `genuine issue' as to the ineffectiveness of appellate counsel in his request to reopen under App.R. 26(B)(5).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “`deficient for failing to raise the issues he now presents and that there was a reasonable probability of success had he *Page 3 presented those claims on appeal.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.