Post v. Harber

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 8, 2001

Ohio Supreme Court · decided 2001-08-08

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently March 2003

1 state decisions

Relies on Clark v. Scarpelli · Littrell v. Wigglesworth

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2001-08-08

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1The discretionary appeal is allowed.

¶2The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings on the authority of Littrell v. Wigglesworth (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 425, 746 N.E.2d 1077, and Clark v. Scarpelli (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 271, 744 N.E.2d 719.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.Cook, J., concurs in judgment only.Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents.Elk & Elk Co., L.P.A, and Todd 0. Rosenberg, for appellants.Isaac, Brant, Ledman & Teetor, Steven G. LaForge and Barbara Kozar Letcher, for appellee Ohio Farmers Insurance Company.Mann & Preston, L.L.P., and Mark A Preston, for appellee State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company.