State v. Hooks’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
88 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 90 later decisions — most recently January 2026 · most notably State v. Brown (2002), 99 Ohio St. 3d 439 - State v. Williams (2003)
88 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · State v. Bradley · State v. Ishmail · State v. Hill · State v. Murnahan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 90 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“* * * a reviewing court cannot add matter to the record before it that was not a part of the trial court's proceedings, and then decide the appeal on the basis of the new matter. Nor can the effectiveness of appellate counsel be judged by adding new matter to the record and then arguing that counsel should have raised these new issues revealed by this newly added material.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“shall be granted if there is a genuine issue as to whether the applicant was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel on appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“`bears the burden of establishing that there was a”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.