Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

92 Okla. 40

217 P 192

Chamness v. Speckman

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 24, 1923

Supreme Court of Oklahoma · decided 1923-07-24

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently May 1956

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1923-07-24

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 Opinion by

PINKHAM, C.

¶2 This is an appeal from the action of the- district court of Okmulgee county, Okla., in rendering' judgment in favor of the defendants in error. The cause was duly reached for hearing upon the docket of thi-s court, submitted and assigned for the preparation of an opinion. Upon an examination of the record it appears that neither party has filed a brief in the case, although the time for so doing has long isince expired.

¶3 •In these circumstances, the appeal of the plaintiffs in error must be dismissed for want of prosecution.

¶4 By the Court: It is so ordered.

/92/okla/40 · .json · Public domain