State v. TEC’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
April 2025
most recently cited
15 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Fussell v. Price · Williams v. United States · 122 Wash. 2d 109 - State v. Halstien · 118 Wash. 2d 551 - State v. Elgin · 125 Wash. 2d 146 - State v. Krall
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To uphold a disposition outside the standard range, the court of appeals must find (a) that the reasons supplied by the disposition judge are supported by the record which was before the judge and that those reasons clearly and convincingly support the conclusion that a disposition within the range would constitute a manifest injustice, and (b) that the sentence imposed was neither clearly excessive nor clearly too lenient.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.