Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 92 So. 2d 739 - Powell v. Cox

92 So. 2d 739 - Powell v. Cox’s Empirical Analysis

1957

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
May 2017
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently May 2017

12 state decisions

401957196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Donnell v. Gray · New Orleans Bank & Trust Co. v. City of New Orleans · J. A. Bel Lumber Co. v. Stout · Standard Oil Co. v. Barlow · Donnell v. Gray

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"* * * `Abandonment' of property or of a right is the voluntary relinquishment thereof by its owner or holder, with the intention of terminating his ownership, possession and control, and without vesting ownership in any other person. Powell v. Cox, supra, [La.App., 92 So.2d 739 ]; New Orleans Bank & Trust Co. v. City of New Orleans, 176 La. 946 , 147 So. 42 (1933). * * *"”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “This court held in Donnell v. Gray, La. App., 34 So.2d 648 [(La.App. 2d Cir.1948)], that the abandonment of property by a tenant to such an extent as to vest title and control in the landlord involves both an act of abandonment and a specific intent to abandon. On a review of that decision -by the Supreme Court, doubt was expressed that the facts of the case justified a holding that the lessee’s silence, coupled with his failure to remove the equipment over a period of 14 months from defendant’s land, constituted an abandonment, the lessee’s actions negating any presumption of any intent on his part to abandon the property. 215 La. 497 , 41 So.2d 66 [ (La.1949) ]. Cox, 92 So.2d at 742 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.