¶1Affirmed. See Little v. State, 77 So.3d 722, 722-23 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (holding that “section 893.13, as amended by section 893.101, Florida Statutes (2002), is constitutional”; rejecting Shelton v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, 802 F.Supp.2d 1289, 1308 (M.D.Fla.2011), in which a federal court held that section 893.13, Florida Statutes (2004), “violates the due process clause and that the statute is unconstitutional on its face”); Ortega v. State, 76 So.3d 346 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011); see also State v. Washington, — So.3d - (Fla. 3d DCA 2012); Bryant v. State, 89 So.3d 1073 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012); Alvarez v. State, 88 So.3d 430 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012); State v. Adkins, 71 So.3d 184 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011), review granted, 71 So.3d 117 (Fla.2011).
92 So. 3d 281
Beckles v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided July 11, 2012
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2012-07-11
Relies on Santiago v. State · Shelton v. Secretary, Department of Corrections · 77 So. 3d 722 - Little v. State
Decided 2012-07-11