92 So. 3d 902 - Bruce v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Moran v. Burbine · Lehman Bros. v. Lilly · State v. Haynes · 594 So. 2d 292 - Fenelon v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“' The police cannot rely on the failure to notify interrogators of a lawyer’s presence to skirt the ... due process requirements imposed by Haliburton II. Thus, the fact , that the interrogating detectives in this case were unaware of [the attorney’s] presence at the station house is without legal significance. To allow the police to hide behind the imprecise standard of the good faith ignorance of the interrogators would encourage law enforcement to be deaf and blind to a lawyer’s attempts to contact his client in the station house.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.