Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 92 SW3D 278 - Phillips v. Par Electrical Contractors

Phillips v. Par Electrical Contractors’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
August 2015
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on West v. Posten Construction Co. · Akers v. Warson Garden Apartments · Ceradsky v. Mid-America Dairymen, Inc. · Miller v. Hirschbach Motor Lines, Inc. · Porter v. Erickson Transport Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the extent of control [granted by the contracts], (2) the actual exercise of control, (3) the duration of the employment, (4) the right to discharge, (5) the method of payment, (6) the degree to which the alleged employer furnished equipment, (7) the extent to which the work is the regular business of the employer, and (8) the [label used in the] employment contracts].”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.