Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 92 U.S. 27 - Hall v. United States

Hall v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

92 U.S. 27 · 1875

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
6
states following
September 1925
most recently cited

2 district · 13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 1925

2 district · 13 state decisions

60187518801890190019101920decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Osborn v. Nicholson · Fowler v. Merrill · Hill v. Bishop · Jackson ex dem. People v. Lervey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The United States have no interest in the controversy: The government is merely a fund-holder for the benefit of the one of the two other parties who shall succeed in the litigation.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.