Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 92 U.S. 618 - Lewis Trustee v. United States

Lewis Trustee v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

92 U.S. 618 · 1875

Citation profile

266
cited by 266 later decisions
32
cited 32 times by the Supreme Court
20
states following
July 2012
most recently cited

63 federal appellate · 39 district · 43 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 266 later decisions (32 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2012 · most notably Will v. Michigan Department of State Police (1989), United States v. United Mine Workers of America (1947)

63 federal appellate · 39 district · 43 state decisions — followed in 20 states

630187518801890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Fisher · United States v. Herron · Rodford v. Craig · Nelson v. Hill

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 266 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Where the language of a statute is transparent, and its meaning clear, there is no room for the office of construction. There should be no construction where there is nothing-to construe. * * * Affirmative discussion, under such circumstances, is not unlike argument in support of a self-evident truth. The logic may mislead or confuse. It cannot strengthen the preexisting conviction.””
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Tlie United States are in .no wise bound by the bankrupt act. The clause above quoted is in pari materia with the several acts giving priority of payment to the United States, and was doubtless put in to recognize and reaffirm the rights which those statutes give, and to exclude the possibility of a different conclusion.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “It is a settled principle of equity that a creditor holding collaterals is not bound to apply them before enforcing his direct remedies against the debtor.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.