Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 92 U.S. 77 - United States v. Landers

United States v. Landers’s Empirical Analysis

92 U.S. 77 · 1875

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
8
cited 8 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
May 1961
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 2 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions (8 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 1961

4 federal appellate · 2 district · 5 state decisions

901875188018901900191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ex Parte: in the Matter of William Wells on a Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus · United States v. Kelly

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Forfeiture of pay and allowances up to the time of desertion follows from the conditions of the contract of enlistment, which is for faithful service. The contract is an entirety; and, if service for any portion of the time is criminally omitted, the pay and allowances for faithful service are not earned. And, for the purpose of determining the rights of the soldier to receive pay and allowances for past services, the fact of desertion need not be established by the findings of a court martial; it is sufficient to justify a withholding of the moneys that the fact appears upon the muster-rolls of his company. If the entry of desertion has been improperly made, its cancellation can be obtained by application to the War Department. But forfeiture of pay . and allowances for future services, as a condition of restoration to duty, can only be imposed by a court martial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.