Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 92 Utah 114 - State v. McNaughtan

State v. McNaughtan’s Empirical Analysis

1937

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
December 1947
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 6 Okla. Crim. 492 - Scott v. State · State v. Jenson · State v. Chynoweth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We have considered all the cases'cited by defendant, and we find none where it was held insufficient to show intent to steal where there was evidence tending to show that defendant did mark as his what the jury could readily infer he must have known was not his. In State v. Chynoweth, 41 Utah 354 , 126 P. 302 , the calf which was branded by defendant had no marks on it. Moreover, there was evidence of statements made by and conduct of the defendant in the presence of those at the corral when he was accused of being a ‘sheep thief,’ and statements made by him to Wm. H. Siddoway, which had some tendency, taken with the remainder of the testimony, to show that he was guilty.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.