Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 92 Wash. 2d 128 - State v. Huntzinger

92 Wash. 2d 128 - State v. Huntzinger’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

31 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently April 2019 · most notably 125 Wash. 2d 146 - State v. Krall (1994), HomeStreet, Inc. v. STATE, DEPT. OF REVENUE (2009)

31 state decisions

12019791980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 89 Wash. 2d 256 - State v. McDonald · 2 Wash. 2d 162 - Spokane County Ex Rel. Sullivan v. Glover

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`all the terms and provisions of the act in relation to the subject of the legislation, the nature of the act, the general object to be accomplished and consequences that would result from construing the particular statute in one way or another'”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “After the superintendent's report has been filed [at the end of the observation period], the court shall determine whether or not the defendant is a sexual psychopath.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “the existence of the procedures for determining sexual psychopathy in itself indicates legislative recognition of an alternative to criminal punishment through segregation, treatment and rehabilitation of sexual psychopaths.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.