Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 92 Wash. 2d 143 - State v. Crowell

92 Wash. 2d 143 - State v. Crowell’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
2
states following
April 2022
most recently cited

36 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently April 2022 · most notably 123 Wash. 2d 296 - Matter of Personal Restraint of Lord (1994), 110 Wash. 2d 32 - State v. Ng (1988)

36 state decisions

160197919801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Shadwick v. City of Tampa · 60 Wash. 2d 836 - Gardner v. Malone · 73 Wash. 2d 804 - Detrick v. Garretson Packing Co. · 90 Wash. 2d 733 - State v. Boogaard · 68 Wash. 2d 65 - State v. Ollison

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[N] either the trial court nor we can consider a juror's statements as to whether the conversation with the bailiff influenced the jury; such effects inhere in the verdict and cannot be used to impeach it. We can only attempt to discover what was said and examine the remarks for their possible prejudicial impact.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]his principle is subject to the limitation that, to the extent that such an order is predicated upon rulings as to the law, such as those involving the admissibility of evidence or the correctness of an instruction, no element of discretion is involved.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “'that to which the juror testifies can be rebutted by other testimony without probing a juror's mental processes.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.