92 Wash. 2d 736 - State v. Hultman’s Empirical Analysis
1979
Citation profile
31 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently October 2002 · most notably State v. Berry (1980), 102 Wash. 2d 466 - In Re the Personal Restraint of Knapp (1984)
31 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 81 Wash. 2d 648 - State v. Kuhn · 83 Wash. 2d 342 - Reanier v. Smith · 89 Wash. 2d 720 - State v. Mortrud · State v. Reinhart · 68 Wash. 2d 903 - State v. Wills
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“While we are cognizant that both State v. Monday, [ 12 Wn. App. 429 , 531 P.2d 811 (1975)], and State v. Wills, [ 68 Wn.2d 903 , 416 P.2d 124 (1966)], refuse to credit probationary incarceration time on the underlying sentence when a suspended sentence is revoked, we believe the rationale of Reanier v. Smith . . ., as applied to pretrial detention, is in large measure applicable in this case and that Hultman should receive credit for his probationary jail time on his underlying sentence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““We find no compelling reason to deny the prosecutor the opportunity to amend the petition to allege a violation occurring so late in the period of probation that amendment could not reasonably be expected within the term. We emphasize that the test mandates no unnecessary delay from the filing of the orig inal revocation petition to the date of the revocation hearing.” 92 Wash. 2d at 744-45 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Williams“To allow credit for probationary time represents a change in policy of criminal sentencing from that of reinstating the original sentence upon revocation of an order of suspension. . . . [A]ny change in this policy should be made by the legislature.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.