92 Wash. 2d 91 - State v. Bianchi’s Empirical Analysis
1979
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 30 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently July 2011 · most notably United States v. Hubbard (1980), 97 Wash. 2d 30 - Seattle Times Co. v. Ishikawa (1982)
5 federal appellate · 30 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Nebraska Press Assn. v. Stuart · Gannett Pacific Corp. v. Richardson · Central South Carolina Chapter v. United States District Court for District of South Carolina · State v. Simants
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]here is no rule, statute, or precedent in this state that would allow a third party to intervene in a criminal proceeding.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage“"It is clear that the Society should not participate in a case to which it is not a party. Even in civil cases, intervention requires an interest in the transaction or property before the court. FRCP 24. But the Society has no interest in the determination of the defendant’s guilt or innocence to justify its intervention. Moreover, there is no counterpart to intervention in the criminal law or rules. Since we find nothing in the criminal law or rules permitting the Society to intervene in this case, to introduce collateral issues, and to disrupt the pending criminal trial, we dismiss the appeal.” Id. at 563, 565.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.