State v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. A Parcel of Land Buildings Appurtenances and Improvements Known As 92 Buena Vista Avenue Rumson New Jersey · Williams v. Walker-Thomas Furniture Co. · State v. Hendrickson · 86 Wash. 2d 256 - Schroeder v. Fageol Motors, Inc. · 127 Wash. 2d 124 - Nelson v. McGoldrick
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“He left blank the space provided for rejection of cure. On February 22, 1991, Mahoney gave the Browns' attorney a cashier's check in the name of Bruce Hampton to cure the default. Mahoney also gave the attorney an unrecorded real estate contract for the Kalama property from Mahoney to Hampton backdated to June 1, 1990. After this attempted cure, the Government accepted the Browns' offer and agreed to split the surplus following a nonjudicial forfeiture and sale by the Browns. The Browns' attorney prepared the agreement and sent it with a letter dated February 25, 1991, stating”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Brown“7. Assuming the successful forfeiture by Browns of the Real Estate Contract of Reeder/Mahoney and any other parties claiming by, through or under him, other than the States, then the property described in Exhibit "A" shall remain in the ownership of Browns with the complete right to hold and manage said property and with the responsibility of any taxes or assessments which may be applicable thereto. The sale of the property described in Exhibit "A", or any part thereof, will be only upon the prior written consent of all parties hereto.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Brown“incurred by state and local governmental agencies in investigating, prosecuting, adjudicating, incarcerating and treating drug-related offenders. Laws of 1989, ch. 271, § 211. RCW 69.50.505(a)(8) provides that”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Brown
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.