Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 92 WIS 267 - Gianella v. Bigelow

Gianella v. Bigelow’s Empirical Analysis

1896

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
April 1935
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently April 1935

5 state decisions

2018961900191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Western Union Railroad v. Dickson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““. . . it is obvious that the section was amended for the very purpose of restricting appeals. The right formerly ex isted from an order striking out a demurrer on motion as frivolous, independent of the right from the order sustaining or overruling the demurrer. Therefore, though the effect of the two orders is substantially the same, if the issue is brought to a hearing on regular notice for the first day of the term, general or special, an appeal may be taken from the order sustaining or overruling the demurrer. Tf a party sees fit to resort to the more summary method, by motion to strike out as frivolous, the order entered thereon will not be appealable.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.