Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 92 Wis. 2d 1 - Jackson v. State

92 Wis. 2d 1 - Jackson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
3
states following
March 2016
most recently cited

24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently March 2016

24 state decisions

14019791980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2313

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · United States v. Gipson · 91 Wis. 2d 134 - Holland v. State · Roberts v. Williams · 60 Wis. 2d 683 - State v. Cydzik

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) ACTS. Whoever does any of the following may be penalized as provided in sub. (3): (a) Intentionally takes and carries away, uses, transfers, conceals, or retains possession of moveable property of another without the other's consent and with intent to deprive the owner permanently of possession of such property.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Alternatively, if more than one is submitted to the jury, the court must instruct the jury that before they may find the defendant guilty, they must unanimously agree on the alternative element they find was proven beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “he either intentionally took and carried away or used or transferred or concealed or retained possession of movable property of another without lawful authority.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.