92 Wis. 2d 554 - State v. Rock’s Empirical Analysis
1979
Citation profile
65 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 65 later decisions — most recently September 2018 · most notably 131 Wis. 2d 246 - State v. Bangert (1986), 124 Wis. 2d 628 - State v. Pitsch (1985)
65 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Jaben v. United States · State v. Reppin · 43 Wis. 2d 661 - Ernst v. State · 57 Wis. 2d 543 - State v. Harper · 51 Wis. 2d 175 - Ameen v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 65 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) that a violation of a constitutional right ha[d] occurred; (2) that this violation caused him to enter a plea of guilty or of no contest; and (3) that at the time of his plea, he was unaware of the potential constitutional challenges to the case against him because of the violation. Id. (citation omitted).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“'[o]nce the lawyer has concluded that it is in the best interests of the accused to enter a guilty plea, he should use reasonable persuasion to guide the client to a sound decision'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Effective representation is not to be equated, as some accused believe, with a not-guilty verdict. But the representation must be equal to that which the ordinarily prudent lawyer, skilled and versed in criminal law, would give to clients who had privately retained his services.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.