Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

920 F.2d 720

Docket No. 89-7209.

Clisby v. Jones

Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Dec. 17, 1990.

Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1990-12-17

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently July 1994

5 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 46

Relies on Clisby v. Jones

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1990-12-17

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Don Siegelman, Atty. Gen., and Ed Carnes and John Gibbs, Asst. Attys. Gen., The Alabama State House, Montgomery, Ala., for respondent-appellant, cross-appel-lee.

¶2Cathy S. Wright, Tony G. Miller, Deborah J. Long, Maynard, Cooper, Fierson & Gale, P.C., Birmingham, Ala., for petitioner-appellee, cross-appellant.

¶4*721ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

¶5Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, FAY, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, CLARK, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH and DUBINA, Circuit Judges.*

¶6BY THE COURT:

¶7A member of this Court in active service having requested , a poll on the applications for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this Court in active service having voted in favor of granting rehearing en banc,

¶8IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by this Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

¶9The clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of en banc briefs.

/920/f2d/720 · .json · Public domain