United States v. Gilbert’s Empirical Analysis
920 F.2d 878 · 1991
Citation profile
23 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 59 later decisions — most recently April 2016 · most notably Huminski v. Corsones (2004), Sentinel Communications Co. v. Watts (1991)
23 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Washington v. Davis · Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'n · Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for Vincent
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Nothing in the Constitution requires the Government freely to grant access to all who wish to exercise their right to free speech on every type of Government property without regard to the nature of the property or to the disruption that might be caused by the speaker's activities.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“an injunction that prohibits [appellant] from engaging in expressive conduct [on a public forum] that others are free to engage in clearly cannot withstand strict scrutiny”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“must present affirmative evidence in order to defeat a properly supported motion for summary judgment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.