U.S. v. White’s Empirical Analysis
920 F.3d 1109 · 2019
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (§ 101 of the Speedy Trial Act of 1974) · 18 U.S.C. § 3162 (§ 101 of the Speedy Trial Act of 1974)
Relies on United States v. Olano · Puckett v. United States · Rodriguez De Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc. · State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Campbell · Henderson v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a defendant forfeits an argument by, for instance, failing to make it before the district court, failing to make it in its opening appellate brief, or identifying it without pressing it”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“a defendant waives an argument by, for instance, withdrawing a motion or objection, stating that a proposition is not disputed, or stating that they are not pressing an argument,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“failure to make the timely assertion of a right ....”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.