Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 920 F.3d 212 - Gibson v. Collier

Gibson v. Collier’s Empirical Analysis

920 F.3d 212 · 2019

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
February 2025
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Estelle v. Gamble · Farmer v. Brennan · Gregg v. Georgia

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “there is no consensus in the medical community about the necessity and efficacy of [GCS] as a treatment for gender dysphoria. ... This on-going medical debate dooms Gibson's claim.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “blanket, categorical denial of medically indicated surgery solely on the basis of an administrative policy ... is the paradigm of deliberate indifference”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “a strong desire to be rid of one's primary and/or secondary sex characteristics because of a marked incongruence with one's experienced/expressed gender”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.