Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 920 F.3d 567 - U.S. v. Druger

U.S. v. Druger’s Empirical Analysis

920 F.3d 567 · 2019

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
July 2024
most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on Kimbrough v. United States · United States v. Edwards · United States v. Close · United States v. Ramos · United States v. Trejo

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “one theory based on the evidence presented could allow for a reasonable jury to find [the defendant] guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[w]e review de novo the denial of a motion for judgment of acquittal based on the sufficiency of the evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “also accept all reasonable inferences in favor of the verdict.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.