Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 920 F.3d 828 - Reid v. Hurwitz

Reid v. Hurwitz’s Empirical Analysis

920 F.3d 828 · 2019

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
April 2025
most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Conley v. Gibson · Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Under the mootness doctrine, we cannot decide a case if 'events have so transpired that the decision will neither presently affect the parties' rights nor have a more-than-speculative chance of affecting them in the future.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.