Rusinow v. Kamara’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
August 2018
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 150 N.J. Super. 474 - Kriegsman v. Kriegsman · 98 N.J. Super. 252 - Jacobs v. PENDEL · Streetman v. Lynaugh · 814 F. Supp. 414 - Haines v. Liggett Group, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““(1) the client persists in a course of action involving the lawyer’s services that the lawyer reasonably believes is criminal or fraudulent; “(2) the client has used the lawyer’s services to perpetrate a crime or fraud; “(3) a client insists upon pursuing an objective that the lawyer considers repugnant or imprudent; “(4) the client fails substantially to fulfil an obligation to the lawyer regarding the lawyer’s services and has been given reasonable warning that the lawyer will withdraw unless the obligation is fulfilled; “(5) the representation will result in an unreasonable financial burden on the lawyer or has been rendered unreasonably difficult by the client; or “(6) other good cause for withdrawal exists.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re Kiley“(1) the reasons why withdrawal is sought; (2) the prejudice withdrawal may cause to other litigants; (3) the harm withdrawal might cause to the administration of justice; and (4) the degree to which withdrawal will delay the resolution of the case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“In cases where withdrawal would significantly impair a party's ability to maintain the action, the court has not permitted counsel to withdraw.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.