Corpac v. Rubin & Rothman, LLC’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1692 (Fair Debt Collection Practices Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 1692K (Sherman Antitrust Act)
Relies on Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Shutts · Board of Education v. Nyquist · Hull v. Celanese Corp. · Armstrong v. McAlpin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“There are no hard and fast rules for striking the balance between enforcement of ethical rules and the preservation of client rights. Instead, “the conclusion in a particular case can be reached only after a painstaking analysis of the facts and precise application of precedent.” Board of Ed. v. Nyquist, 590 F.2d 1241 , 1246 (2d Cir.1979), citing Fund of Funds, Ltd. v. Arthur Andersen & Co., 567 F.2d 225, 227 (2d Cir.1977).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.