Figures v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
January 2019
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Crawford v. Washington · Wright v. Wright · Insurance Co. of North America v. United States Department of Labor · Anglemyer v. State · Anglemyer v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a probation revocation, we consider only the evidence most favorable to the judgment without reweighing the evidence or judging witnesses' credibility. Figures v. State , 920 N.E.2d 267 , 272 (Ind. Ct. App. 2010) (citing Woods , 892 N.E.2d at 639 ). "A probation revocation hearing is civil in nature, and the State's burden is to prove the alleged violations by a preponderance of the evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“A probation revocation hearing is civil in nature, and the State's burden is to prove the alleged violations by a preponderance of the evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[pJroof of any one violation is sufficient to revoke a defendant's probation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Williams v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.