Munt v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
July 2019
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Rutledge v. United States · State v. Johnson · State v. Olson · State v. Prudhomme · State Ex Rel. Stangvik v. Tahash
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“when an offense has been proved against the defendant, and there exists a reasonable doubt as to which of two or more degrees the defendant is guilty, the defendant shall be convicted only of the lowest.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Rossberg v. State“A sentence is unauthorized if it is contrary to law or applicable statutes.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Johnson v. State“at any time [to] correct a sentence not authorized by law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Rossberg v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.